Antifeedancy of neem products containing azadirachtin against Culex tarsalis and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera : Culicidae)

Authors
Citation
Ty. Su et Ms. Mulla, Antifeedancy of neem products containing azadirachtin against Culex tarsalis and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera : Culicidae), J VECT ECOL, 23(2), 1998, pp. 114-122
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VECTOR ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
10811710 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
114 - 122
Database
ISI
SICI code
1081-1710(199812)23:2<114:AONPCA>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
In order to develop and utilize new botanical insecticides originating from neem (Azadirachra indica A. Juss) in mosquito control programs as a potent ial larvicide, the antifeedant activity of three formulations of neem again st the larvae of Culex tarsalis Coquillett and Culex quinquefasciatus Say w as investigated under laboratory conditions. A significant antifeedancy was indicated at 5 ppm and 10 ppm azadirachtin (AZ) for all formulations and b oth species. Within the test concentration range of AZ (1-10 ppm), 5 ppm wa s the minimum effective concentration for antifeedancy in most cases. Some differences in larval susceptibility in terms of antifeedancy to the test f ormulations were netted between the two species. The Cx. tarsalis larvae we re more susceptible than Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae to Azad EC 4.5 at 1 pp m during the first 15-min exposure period and at 5 and 10 ppm during the wh ole test period. The Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae were more susceptible than Cv. tarsalis larvae to Azatin WP 4.5 at 1, 5, and 10 ppm during the first 15-min exposure period or to Neemix EC 4.5 at 1 ppm during the first 45-min exposure period. The formulation-related differences in antifeedant activi ty appeared when the concentration increased from 1 to 10 ppm. In Cx, tarsa lis, the Azad EC 4.5 and Neemix EC 4.5 were more effective than Azatin WP 4 .5 at 5 ppm during the first 15-min exposure period and at 10 ppm during th e whole test period. In Cv. quinquefasciatus, the Azatin WP 4.5 and Neemix EC 4.5 were more effective than Azad EC 4.5 at 1 ppm during the first 30-mi n exposure period, and at 5 ppm during the first 60-min exposure period, an d at 10 ppm during the whale test period.