D. Dey et al., Comparison of ordered subsets expectation maximization and Chang's attenuation correction method in quantitative cardiac SPET: A phantom study, NUCL MED C, 19(12), 1998, pp. 1149-1157
Photon attenuation is one of the primary causes of artifacts in cardiac sin
gle photon emission tomography (SPET). Several attenuation correction algor
ithms have been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the effect o
f using the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction
algorithm and Chang's non-uniform attenuation correction method on quantita
tive cardiac SPET. We performed SPET scans of an anthropomorphic phantom si
mulating normal and abnormal myocardial studies. Attenuation maps of the ph
antom were obtained from computed tomographic images. The SPET projection d
ata were corrected for attenuation using OSEM reconstruction, as well as Ch
ang's method. For each defect scan and attenuation correction method, we ca
lculated three quantitative parameters: average radial maximum (ARM) ratio
of the defect-to-normal area, maximum defect contrast (MDC) and defect volu
me, using automated three-dimensional quantitation. The differences between
the two methods were less than 4% for defect-to-normal ARM ratio, 19% for
MDC and 13% for defect volume. These differences are within the range of es
timated statistical variation of SPET. The calculation times of the two met
hods were comparable. For all SPET studies, OSEM attenuation correction gav
e a more correct activity distribution, with respect to both the homogeneit
y of the radiotracer and the shape of the cardiac insert. The difference in
uniformity between OSEM and Chang's method was quantified by segmental ana
lysis and found to be less than 8% for the normal study in conclusion, OSEM
and Chang's attenuation correction are quantitatively equivalent, with com
parable calculation times. OSEM reconstruction gives a more correct activit
y distribution and is therefore preferred. ((C) 1998 Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins).