Research on hormonal treatments of prostate cancer over the past 20 y have
focused on maximizing androgen ablation through combination therapy. Maxima
l androgen ablation increases treatment-related side-effects and expense an
d fails to prolong time to androgen-independent (AI) progression. The ratio
nale behind intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) is based on: (1) observ
ations that androgen ablation is palliative, not curative in most patients
where quality of life must be considered; (2) assumption that immediate and
rogen ablation is superior to delayed therapy in improving survival of pati
ents with prostate cancer; and (3) the hypothesis that if tumor cells which
survive androgen withdrawal are forced into a normal pathway of differenti
ation by androgen replacement, then apoptotic potential might be restored a
nd progression to androgen independence may be delayed. Observations from a
nimal model studies suggest that progression to androgen-independence invol
ves adaptive responses to androgen deprivation which are, in turn, modulate
d by intermittent androgen replacement.
Supported by these animal model observations, several centers have now test
ed the feasibility of IAS therapy in non-randomized groups of patients with
prostate cancer using serum PSA as trigger points. Experimental and clinic
al data suggest that prostate cancer is amenable to control by IAS. IAS may
offer clinicians an opportunity to improve quality of life in patients wit
h prostate cancer by balancing the benefits of immediate androgen ablation
(delayed progression and prolonged survival) while reducing treatment-relat
ed side effects and expense. Whether time to progression and survival is af
fected in a beneficial or adverse way is being studied in randomized, prosp
ective protocols. The purpose of this article is to review the rationale be
hind IAS, compare observations from published series, and discuss potential
indications and treatment strategies using IAS.