Two studies assessed the presence of a synchrony effect between peak circad
ian arousal and time of testing for both older and younger adults. Particip
ants performed a reading aloud task that included distracting words that we
re either present or absent and, if present, were either thematically relat
ed or unrelated to the target text. As well, the distracting material was p
resented in either spatially predictable or unpredictable locations. In eac
h experiment, older and younger adults were tested at optimal versus nonopt
imal times. Both experiments showed age differences in susceptibility to di
straction, replicating earlier findings (e.g., M. C. Carlson, L. Hasher, R.
T. Zacks, & S. L. Connelly, 1995). Neither showed differences due to time
of testing, suggesting a boundary condition for cognitive disruptions assoc
iated with circadian arousal patterns.