This paper establishes a clear connection between equilibrium theory,
game theory and social choice theory by showing that, for a well defin
ed social choice problem, a condition which is necessary and sufficien
t to solve this problem - limited arbitrage - is the same as the condi
tion which is necessary and sufficient to establish the existence of a
n equilibrium and the core. The connection is strengthened by establis
hing that a market allocation, which is in the core, can always be rea
lized as a social allocation, i.e. an allocation which is optimal acco
rding to an ordering chosen by a social choice rule. Limited arbitrage
characterizes those economies without Condorcet triples, and those fo
r which Arrow's paradox can be resolved on choices of large utility va
lues.