C. Blodau et al., Iron and sulfate reduction in the sediments of acidic mine lake 116 (Brandenburg, Germany): Rates and geochemical evaluation, WATER A S P, 108(3-4), 1998, pp. 249-270
A combination of rate measurements of iron(III)oxide and sulfate reduction,
thermodynamic data, and pore-water and solid phase analyses was used to ev
aluate the relative significance of iron and sulfate reduction in the sedim
ents of an acidic strip mining lake (Lake 116, Brandenburg, Germany). The r
ate of sulfate reduction was determined using a S-35-radiotracer method. Ra
tes of iron turnover were quantified by mass balances based on pore-water c
oncentration profiles. The differences in Gibbs free energy yield from redu
ction of iron and sulfate and from methanogenesis were calculated from indi
vidual redox couples and concentrations of reactants to account for the inf
luence of high Fe2+ concentrations and differing mineral phases. Integrated
(O-20 cm) mean rates of sulfate reduction were 1.2 (pelagial), respectivel
y 5.2 (littoral) mmol (m(2)d)(-1). Based on electron equivalents, the estim
ated iron reduction rates reached between about 50 % (pelagial) and 75 % (l
ittoral) of the sulfate reduction rates. Compared to conditions usually ass
umed in the literature, in the sediments Gibbs free energy advantage of iro
n reauction over sulfate reduction was reduced from +11 KJeq(-1) to a range
of about +7 KJeq(-1)(ferrihydrite, "reactive iron") to -6 KJeq(-1) (goethi
te). This indicates that iron reduction was thermodynamically favored to su
lfate reduction only if amorphous iron(III)oxides were available and is in
accordance to the high competitiveness of sulfate reducers in the sediment.
While total iron concentration in the sediments was high (up to 80% of the
dryweight), reactive iron only accounted for 11-38% and was absolutely and
relatively diminished in the zone of iron reduction. Pore-water concentrat
ion gradients and (CS)-C-137 profiles indicated that little or no bioturbat
ion occurred in the sediments, probably inhibiting the renewal of reactive
iron. We further hypothesize that the reactivity of the iron oxide surfaces
was reduced due to adsorption of DOM, suggested by IR spectra of the DOM a
nd by a surface coverage estimate using literature data. Pelagial and litto
ral sediments displayed different dynamics. At the littoral relative iron r
eduction rate estimates were higher, iron sulfides were not accumulated and
residence times of iron oxides were short compared to the pelagial. At the
littoral site reoxidation of iron sulfides probably resulted in the renewa
l of reactive iron(III)oxides, possibly allowing for higher relative rates
of iron reduction.