Purpose: There is a need for new non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of
carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Detection of the enzyme telomerase in uri
ne could offer these new diagnostic possibilities. The standard technique f
or detecting telomerase activity is the TRAP assay (telomeric repeat amplif
ication protocol). Because of the instability of the ribonucleoprotein telo
merase in an aggressive medium, such as urine, investigations conducted to
date have yielded non-uniform or even contradictory findings. Thus, the obj
ective of the present study was to establish a more reliable detection meth
od for telomerase in urine. Therefore we examined the detection of the rece
ntly determined RNA portion of human telomerase (hTR) by RT-PCR and compare
d it to telomerase activity. Materials and Methods: Urine samples were obta
ined prior to surgery from 35 patients with confirmed bladder cancer, 24 pa
tients with other urologic disorders (urolithiasis, urinary tract infection
s) and from 38 healthy volunteers. Each sample was examined for the presenc
e of human telomerase RNA (hTR) and telomerase activity. Identification of:
hTR was performed using a RT-PCR method, while telomerase activity was det
ected using the PCR based TRAP assay. For both methods new non radioactive
detection methods were used. Results: Increased levels of hTR were found in
29 of 35 urine samples (sensitivity 83%, specifity 82%) obtained from pati
ents with bladder cancer. Telomerase activity was detected in only 2/35 (6%
) of these same cases. In healthy volunteers RT-PCR detected hTR at low lev
els in 5 of 38 (13%) samples, but telomerase activity was not observed. For
patients with benign urologic disorders such as urolithiasis or urinary tr
act infections hTR was detected in samples obtained from 6 out of 24 patien
ts (25%). Conclusions: The detection of hTR by RT-PCR represents a promisin
g new method for detecting malignant cells in urine which is practicable fo
r routine clinical use.