Attrition of subjects from therapeutic treatment programs, long recognized
as a bane of evaluation researchers, is the focus of hundreds of studies pu
rporting to explain, measure or correct it. This article discusses the scop
e and limitations of research regarding the causes of premature termination
from psychotherapeutic and substance abuse programs and examines the appli
cability of proposed methodological remedies for assessing and countering a
ttrition to the specific problem of research involving dropouts from treatm
ent. By and large, research on the causes of attrition suffers from inadequ
ate conceptualization and weak methodological designs. The researcher's ant
icipation and measurement of factors driving premature program termination
is key to the effective assessment and correction of problematic attrition
in treatment evaluations. The phenomenon of attrition from treatment requir
es more rigorous attention from the evaluation community.