This article reviews the information currently available on the pharmacoeco
nomic profile of taxanes in ovarian cancer. Because paclitaxel is the only
taxene approved for this clinical indication, our overview is almost entire
ly focused on the cost-effectiveness profile of this drug. In advanced ovar
ian cancer, first-line regimens based on paclitaxel have been reported to b
e more effective than standard therapy based on cyclophosphamide + cisplati
n. The improved survival with paclitaxel and the increased cost induced by
this drug have prompted a series of pharmacoeconomic analyses, the results
of which are summarized and discussed. Three studies, published between 199
6 and 1997, calculated the cost per life-year gained using paclitaxel + cis
platin as opposed to cyclophosphamide + cisplatin. The estimates of surviva
l gain and increased expenditure using paclitaxel were very similar; conseq
uently, the results produced by these three analyses were homogeneous with
values of cost per life-year gained around $20 000. Because this value is b
elow the conventional limit of $50 000, the pharmacoeconomic results on pac
litaxel suggest a favorable cost-effectiveness profile. Docetaxel is anothe
r taxane proposed for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer; however, th
e drug has not yet been approved for this clinical indication and so a phar
macoeconomic assessment on this agent is still premature. [(C) 1998 Lippinc
ott Williams & Wilkins.].