Crushing of piglets by sows: effects of litter features, pen features and sow behaviour

Citation
Dm. Weary et al., Crushing of piglets by sows: effects of litter features, pen features and sow behaviour, APPL ANIM B, 61(2), 1998, pp. 103-111
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE
ISSN journal
01681591 → ACNP
Volume
61
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
103 - 111
Database
ISI
SICI code
0168-1591(199812)61:2<103:COPBSE>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Crushing of piglets by sows in farrowing pens was studied in a 2 x 2 experi ment to evaluate the effect of different pen design features. Pens had eith er concrete or plastic-coated expanded metal flooring, and half of the pens were fitted with a horizontal bar 23 cm above the near, bisecting the pen. The bar was intended to prevent the sow from rolling suddenly onto her sid e, a movement known to crush piglets in open pens. Ninety-eight Litters wer e analyzed during the first 3 days after birth when most crushing occurs. O f the 927 viable, live-born piglets, 95 (10.2%) died during the study, and 75 of these deaths were due to crushing as indicated by post mortem analysi s. A high incidence of crushing was associated with larger Litter size at b irth, lower average piglet weight gain in early lactation, and older (high parity number) sows; however, these variables were interrelated, with older sows tending to have larger litters with lower early weight gains. Pens wi th a bar had significantly less crushing during the last 2 days of the stud y (Days 2-3), but this was fully offset by a non-significant tendency for m ore crushing in these pens on Days 0-1. Video recordings were analyzed for 16 sows with multiple crushings. Of eight types of sow body movement record ed, two caused most of the crushing: lying down from a standing position (5 4% of crushings observed), and rolling from lying on the udder to lying on the side (33% of crushings observed). Pen design features influenced how of ten the different movements were performed and how often these movements cr ushed piglets, but pen design did not affect the total number of movements or the total number of piglets crushed. Although the comparisons in the stu dy did not result in significant differences in the incidence of crushing, the method shows promise as a way to identify design features that reduce t he incidence of dangerous movements. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rig hts reserved.