Petting and brushing, when used in experiments with animals, is often descr
ibed as a positive contact or 'gentling'; this classification is based on h
uman perception, and fails to consider the animal's perception of such cont
acts. This experiment investigated suckling calves' perception of such cont
acts with humans by measuring their behaviour towards a familiar stockperso
n. A total of 41 beef calves were reared with twice daily sucklings under h
uman control. At 1.5 months, they were allocated to one of three treatments
. For 5 min a day, 5 days a week for 2 weeks they were socially isolated (t
reatment IS, n = 13), or with a stationary stockman who brushed the calf wh
en it approached (treatment PR, n = 14) or with a stockman approaching and
brushing the calf (treatment BR, n = 14). All of the BR calves accepted bru
shing easily within 5 days of treatment. All of the PR calves briefly inter
acted with the stockman within 3 days, but by the end of the treatment, non
e were interacting with the stockman. Two tests were performed on 2 consecu
tive days after the end of the treatments and 1 month later, in the familia
r environment of the treatment procedures. The test procedure included soci
al isolation (1 min), isolation with the stationary stockman (1.5 min) and
isolation with the stockman trying to stroke the calf (1.5 min). Few animal
s approached within 2 m of the stockman during the tests and BR calves tend
ed to stay more than 4 m away from him (P = 0.1). Just after the treatment
period, BR animals allowed more stroking by the stockman (P < 0.01) on the
2 days of tests and were more motionless (P < 0.01) on the first day of tes
ting than animals from the two other treatments. On the second day of testi
ng, both BR and PR calves were more motionless (P < 0.01) than IS animals.
However, all the animals appeared more tolerant 1 month later and no signif
icant difference was found at this age. Acceptance of contact such as brush
ing or stroking appears to be more the result of a habituation process than
one of positive reinforcement. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights r
eserved.