The diagnostic value of a new tumor marker, c-erbB-2, was studied in the se
ra of 50 healthy subjects, 58 patients with benign breast diseases, and 413
patients with breast cancer (186 locoregional, 185 with advanced disease,
and 42 with no evidence of disease). Using 15 U/ml as the cut-off, no healt
hy subjects or patients with benign diseases and only 2.4% of no evidence o
f disease patients had elevated serum levels. Abnormal c-erbB-2 levels were
found in 29% (101/370) of the patients with breast carcinoma (locoregional
9%, metastases 45.4%). CEA (cut-off 5 U/ml) and CA 15.3 (cut-off 35 U/ml)
sensitivity was 18% and 16% in patients with locoregional disease and 61% a
nd 70% in those patients with advanced disease, respectively. A trend towar
d higher serum levels of all three tumor markers in patients with nodal inv
olvement or greater tumor size was found, but was statistically significant
only with CEA (p < 0.01). By contrast, c-erbB-2 was related to steroid rec
eptors, in both locoregional and metastatic tumors. When the prognostic val
ue of these markers was evaluated, patients with abnormally high presurgica
l CEA and c-erbB-2 had a worse prognosis than those patients with normal va
lues, in both node-negative (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) and node
-positive patients (p < 0.556 and p < 0.001. respectively). By contrast, no
relationship was found between CA 15.3 values and prognosis. Multivariate
analysis showed that CEA and c-erbB-2 were also prognostic factors. The cor
relation between serum and tissue levels of c-erbB-2 was studied in the tum
ors of 161 patients. Significantly higher c-erbB-2 serum levels were found
in patients with overexpression in tissue by immunohistochemistry, in both
locoregional and advanced disease (p = 0.0001). Serum concentrations in pat
ients with advanced disease were related to the site of recurrence, with si
gnificantly higher values in patients with metastases (mainly in those with
liver metastases) than in those with locoregional recurrence. In summary,
c-erbB-2 serum levels seem to be a useful tumor marker in the prognosis of
patients with breast cancer. Using all three tumor markers, sensitivity was
35% in patients with locoregional breast cancer and 88% in patients with r
ecurrence.