Ce. Geyer et al., Expanded phase II trial of paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group study, BREAST CANC, 51(2), 1998, pp. 169-181
Background. The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel i
n metastatic breast cancer patients. The design was motivated by a report f
rom FDA and NCI staff proposing assessment of pre- and post-treatment sympt
oms as a means of evaluating treatment effectiveness [1]. Methods. Patients
with symptomatic and/or measurable metastatic breast cancer with prior tre
atment received paclitaxel 210 mg/m(2) as a 3 hour infusion every three wee
ks until toxicity or progression. A unique endpoint was subjective symptoma
tic response, defined as an improvement in the Symptom Distress Scale score
by greater than or equal to 3 points at two successive evaluations before
treatment failure. Patients were also evaluated for objective response and
toxicity. Results. Of 135 patients registered, 123 were eligible and treate
d. The subjective symptomatic response rate for 93 symptomatic patients who
completed forms was 40%, 95% confidence interval 29-51%. The objective res
ponse rate in 77 patients with measurable disease was 19%, 95% confidence i
nterval 11-30%. In patients with both measurable and symptomatic disease, 3
7% had symptomatic and 13% had objective responses. Median times to treatme
nt failure and death were 4 and 11 months, respectively. Toxicity was great
er than anticipated: 12% discontinued treatment due to toxicity, 29% develo
ped at least one Grade 3 neuromuscular toxicity, and two patients died of s
epsis while neutropenic. Conclusion. Paclitaxel by 3 hour infusion at a dos
e of 210 mg/m(2) produced excessive neurotoxicity in patients with previous
ly treated metastatic breast cancer. Both sustained subjective symptom redu
ction and objective responses were demonstrated, but dose reduction for rou
tine practice is recommended.