Prospective care of elderly patients in family practice - Is screening effective?

Citation
Wi. Hay et al., Prospective care of elderly patients in family practice - Is screening effective?, CAN FAM PHY, 44, 1998, pp. 2677-2687
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN
ISSN journal
0008350X → ACNP
Volume
44
Year of publication
1998
Pages
2677 - 2687
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-350X(199812)44:<2677:PCOEPI>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate cost and benefits of screening for and treating healt h and lifestyle risks among community-dwelling elderly. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Primary care. PARTICIPANTS An opportunistic and prompted sample of 619 rostered elderly p atients presenting for treatment who screened positive. INTERVENTIONS One third (209) of experimental subjects had screening questi onnaires placed in their charts with concerns highlighted for referrals. Tw o control groups received usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Yearly assessments of health service use and multidim ensional functional capacity. RESULTS Overall, screening and treatment of functionally active, elderly, m iddle-class people had no significant beneficial effect. Almost half of the experimental sample was ineligible because of treatment noncompliance. Gen erally, ineligible subjects were older and more severely impaired. Subjects 75 years and older with risk factors showed improvement in daily living ac tivities, and those living alone were found to have improved mental health and social functions (11% and 22%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Screening and treatment was ineffective in improving total func tional capacity of all seniors 65 years and older. Elderly people 75 years and older, however, who were living alone or lonely did benefit from screen ing and treatment showing an improvement in daily activities, mental health scores, and social functions. This finding has implications for selective preventive health care spending for the elderly. A 2-year follow-up period could be too brief to detect long-term effects of early intervention with y ounger, middle-class seniors, especially those who are already functionally active.