A comparison is made between two alternative definitions for covalent bond
orders: one derived from the exchange part of the two-particle density matr
ix and the other expressed as the correlation of fluctuations (covariance)
of the number of electrons between the atomic centers. Although these defin
itions lead to identical formulae for mono-determinantal SCF wavefunctions,
they predict different bond orders for correlated wavefunctions. It is sho
wn that, in this case, the fluctuation-based definition leads to slightly l
ower values of the bond order than does the exchange-based definition, prov
ided one uses an appropriate space-partitioning technique like that of Bade
r's topological theory of atoms in a molecule; however, use of Mulliken par
titioning in this context leads to unphysical behaviour. The example of H-2
is discussed in detail, (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved
.