The component of the sampling error caused by taking discrete samples from
a continuous process is the integration error, IE. This error can be estima
ted using P.M. Gy's variographic technique. This method involves the integr
ation of the variogram. The variogram can be calculated from a time series
of discrete samples. If the variogram is simple, it can be modelled and int
egrated. This method has been generally used in, for example, geostatistics
. Gy has pointed out that chemical processes often have variograms that are
too complicated to be modelled with simple equations and has, therefore, p
roposed a numerical point-by-point integration method for the experimental
variogram. Although this method is reliable, it underestimates the integrat
ion error for systematic sampling if a sampling interval close to that used
in the variographic experiment is used. In this study, the integration of
the variogram is carried out using a cubic smoothing spline function. The i
ntegration errors calculated with Gy's method and with the cubic smoothing
spline function are compared with the best estimate of the integration erro
r for the simulated data. The integration errors calculated from the bleach
ing process with the aforementioned methods are also compared. On average,
the integration error calculated with this new method corresponds better wi
th the best estimate of the integration error than that calculated by Gy's
method for the few first multiples of the sampling interval used in the var
iographic experiment. The difference between the methods is not significant
with longer sampling intervals, say, five times the interval of the variog
raphic experiment or longer. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights rese
rved.