Integration of the variogram using spline functions for sampling error estimation

Citation
R. Heikka et P. Minkkinen, Integration of the variogram using spline functions for sampling error estimation, CHEM INTELL, 44(1-2), 1998, pp. 205-211
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS
ISSN journal
01697439 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
205 - 211
Database
ISI
SICI code
0169-7439(199812)44:1-2<205:IOTVUS>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The component of the sampling error caused by taking discrete samples from a continuous process is the integration error, IE. This error can be estima ted using P.M. Gy's variographic technique. This method involves the integr ation of the variogram. The variogram can be calculated from a time series of discrete samples. If the variogram is simple, it can be modelled and int egrated. This method has been generally used in, for example, geostatistics . Gy has pointed out that chemical processes often have variograms that are too complicated to be modelled with simple equations and has, therefore, p roposed a numerical point-by-point integration method for the experimental variogram. Although this method is reliable, it underestimates the integrat ion error for systematic sampling if a sampling interval close to that used in the variographic experiment is used. In this study, the integration of the variogram is carried out using a cubic smoothing spline function. The i ntegration errors calculated with Gy's method and with the cubic smoothing spline function are compared with the best estimate of the integration erro r for the simulated data. The integration errors calculated from the bleach ing process with the aforementioned methods are also compared. On average, the integration error calculated with this new method corresponds better wi th the best estimate of the integration error than that calculated by Gy's method for the few first multiples of the sampling interval used in the var iographic experiment. The difference between the methods is not significant with longer sampling intervals, say, five times the interval of the variog raphic experiment or longer. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights rese rved.