The Declaration of Saint Vincent was the starting point for the European Di
abCare system. Five years of French experience with this system now provide
an opportunity for critical assessment. Within the perspective of quality
assurance, DiabCare is an efficient developmental tool which should eventua
lly allow the divergence between real and ideal quality to be reduced. On t
he basis of a European scientific reference system, each country uses its o
wn funds to organise national campaigns with the assistance of pharmaceutic
al firms. Each year a transverse collection of a month's data concerning al
l hospitalised diabetic patients is done at the European level by means of
a standardised form. Confidential and anonymous analysis of the data is the
n performed by the scientific committee of DiabCare-France and the CERIM of
Lille. Each participating physician receives a report specifying the situa
tion for his group and providing anonymous comparisions with national data.
This rich database offers each centre the possibility for a personalised a
appraisal and retrospective evaluation of modifications in medical practic
es. DiabCare is in fact of interest to a variety of persons and organisatio
ns. For the patient, the DiabCare sheet and the forthcoming Diabcard (smart
card) are means of providing guidance for the annual checkup. The general
practitioner or specialist has indications about his patients' condition an
d guidance for more rigourous management. Interestingly, DiabCare is the on
ly evaluation programme approved by general practitioner unions. For the ho
spital department, DiabCare provides-much more detailed information than PM
SI, offering a department head useful arguments in support of specific budg
et allocations and allowing the care team to consider its activity and dete
rmine priorities. It is a useful and precise evaluation tool for hospitals
in the perspective of future accreditation. For the national and internatio
nal scientific community, it provides data which, though biased by voluntar
y participation and non-epidemiological, are useful for analysis and compar
ison of particular diabetological circumstances in the field. In this respe
ct, it is noteworthy that the World Health Organisation (WHO), the Internat
ional Diabetes Federation, and the CSD have supported this initiative. For
WHO, care practices and payment systems differ considerably in European cou
ntries, so that the existence of a common tool for collecting and evaluatin
g data allows relevant procedures to he identified more quickly and communi
cated and recommended to the different governments. Finally, in view of the
human and economic burden caused by late complications of diabetes, societ
y can benefit Any improvement in the control of risk factors and the object
ive reduction of complications is important for survival of the health care
system.