It has always been difficult to explore local power structures, and local p
olitics (or local political economies) have often been reinterpreted in way
s in which they are simply seen as the working out of wider national or glo
bal processes. The recognition that this is not enough has encouraged a gro
wth in more locally focused research, frequently involving extensive interv
iewing of members of local business and political elites. Two key sets of q
uestions arise from this sort of research. The first concerns the relations
hips between researcher and researched which are constructed by the researc
h process itself. Is it possible to maintain an attitude of critical engage
ment? How is the research agenda constructed through negotiation between th
e participants? Who has power within the research process? The second invol
ves a more serious issue for this form of research: namely, is it really po
ssible to identify and explore power through interviews, however carefully
constructed they are? What about the dimensions of power that are inaccessi
ble to interviewers? This question has bedevilled community-power and plura
list research in the USA and the United Kingdom, and has never been adequat
ely resolved. Do we now have the means to resolve it? The author explores b
oth of these sets of questions with the help of evidence from a range of re
search projects in which he has been actively involved. The conclusion sugg
ests productive approaches to the researching of local elites, identifying
opportunities as well as constraints.