Deposition of nitrogen forms one of the largest threats to the vitality and
biodiversity of Dutch nature areas. Of the two nitrogen compounds contribu
ting to the total nitrogen deposition, Dutch sources of reduced nitrogen ar
e estimated to contribute 47% to the total nitrogen deposition, whereas for
oxidised nitrogen this is only 15%. For Dutch policy it is therefore most
effective to decrease ammonia emissions. To safeguard the nature areas from
ammonia deposition by limiting critical N load exceedances, a reduction of
more than 70% of the ammonia emissions compared with the 1980 level is nee
ded. Such a stringent target causes much friction between agriculture, the
primary source of ammonia, on the one hand and nature conservation and deve
lopment on the other. This friction is mainly caused by the fact that both
the most sensitive natural areas in terms of acidification and eutrophicati
on and the intensive agricultural areas are located on the poor sandy soils
. When searching for solutions to the ammonia stress in natural areas it is
necessary to look at possibilities of reducing emissions and thereby its e
ffects, on the one hand, and at possibilities of disconnecting the spatial
relationship between agriculture and nature, on the other. These two option
s have been addressed in this article and it is found that current policy o
n decreasing ammonia emissions is, even after disconnecting agriculture and
nature, not enough to safeguard the nature areas. However, introducing spe
cific functions for nature areas, thereby introducing higher critical loads
, will provide the possibility for lower emission decreases than is needed
for Dutch nature at present.