In Kerala, based on management systems, sacred groves can be categorised in
to three groups namely those managed by individual families, by groups of f
amilies and by the statutory agencies for temple management (Devaswom Board
). Ollur Kavu, S.N. Puram Kavu and Iringole Kavu which represent above ment
ioned management systems, respectively, were studied far their tree species
composition and vegetation structure. The study was also designed to asses
s the strengths and weaknesses of present management systems and role of di
fferent stakeholder groups in conserving the sacred groves. Of the three sa
cred groves, the one managed by individual family (Ollur Kavu) is highly di
sturbed as indicated by low stem density of mature trees (367 ha(-1)) and p
oor regeneration potential with the ratio between mature trees and saplings
is 1:0.4. In order to quantify the level of disturbance in these sacred gr
oves, Ramakrishnan index of stand quality (RISQ) was calculated. The values
obtained for all the three tree layers (i.e., mature trees, saplings and s
eedlings) in single family managed sacred grove (Ollur Kavu) was between 2.
265 and 2.731, an indicator of the dominance of light demanding species in
the population, suggested that the grove is highly disturbed one. Whereas,
other two sacred groves are less disturbed as indicated by lower 'RISQ' val
ues (between 1.319 and 1.648). Iringole Kavu and S.N. Puram Kavu were compa
red with some other evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India for the
parameters like stem density, basal area and species diversity of trees (g
bh greater than or equal to 10.1 cm). Values obtained for these parameters
in the two sacred groves are within the range obtained for other forests. S
takeholder importance value index (SIVI) was calculated based on the attrib
utes like the proximity of the stakeholder to the sacred grove, contributio
n of stakeholders in managing the sacred grove, benefits being enjoyed by t
he stakeholder due to involvement with sacred grove and attitude of the sta
keholder group towards the conservation and management of sacred grove. Thi
s indicated that local people, temple trust and/ or sacred grove owners are
the major stakeholders, while in general some other stakeholder groups suc
h as youth clubs, schools, forest department, municipality and local Pancha
yat with lower SM are comparatively neutral in conserving and managing the
groves. Some of the major strategies to be adopted are self-imposed complet
e ban on the removal of biomass for the revitalisation of ecosystem, creati
on of awareness among local people and all stakeholder groups, identificati
on of the type of contribution a stakeholder group can offer in managing th
e sacred grove and encouragement of all stakeholders to participate without
either directly or indirectly adversely affecting the ecosystem as well as
the wisdom and interest of the major stakeholder groups. (C) 1998 Elsevier
Science B.V. All rights reserved.