Am. Iorio et al., Antibody response to 1995-1996 influenza vaccine in institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly women, GERONTOLOGY, 45(1), 1999, pp. 31-38
Background: Concern about poor responsiveness to influenza vaccination by i
nstitutionalized elderly people. Objective: To determine whether institutio
nalized elderly volunteers develop a significant antibody response followin
g influenza vaccine and to compare this response with that of non-instituti
onalized subjects. Methods: The haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody respo
nse after 1995-1996 influenza vaccination [A/Shangdong/9/93 (H3N2), A/Taiwa
n/1/86 (H1N1), B/Panama/45/90] was estimated in 80 elderly women living in
a nursing home and com pa red with that of 51 non-institutionalized women.
Results: No differences were found in the prevaccination status, and, after
vaccination, a significant humoral response was elicited both in instituti
onalized and noninstitutionalized elderly subjects against all th ree influ
enza strains tested. The immune response of institutionalized patients was
satisfactory and significantly higher than that observed in non-institution
alized women. These results were confirmed both by a separate analysis of h
omogeneous subgroups stratified according to the presence in the two cohort
s of potential causes of differential antibody response (prevaccination ant
ibody titre, age, long-term drug treatment, risk factors for influenza infe
ction, and physical disability) and by logistic regression analysis in orde
r to adjust immune responses for the different variables. Conclusion: Influ
enza vaccination is effective in elderly people living in nursing homes. Ho
wever, the postvaccination antibody response to influenza vaccine is influe
nced by different factors directly or indirectly related to residence.