Renal effects of low and isoosmolar contrast media on renal hemodynamic ina normal and ischemic dog kidney

Citation
G. Deray et al., Renal effects of low and isoosmolar contrast media on renal hemodynamic ina normal and ischemic dog kidney, INV RADIOL, 34(1), 1999, pp. 1-4
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00209996 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1 - 4
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-9996(199901)34:1<1:REOLAI>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors investigated the comparative effects of a nonionic dimer contrast medium (iodixanol) with an ionic low osmolar c ontrast media (locm) (ioxaglate) on renal blood in a normal and an ischemic dog kidney. METHODS. Six dogs were studied for two periods. during the first period (th e control period) a renal arteriography was performed with either iodixanol (visipaque) or ioxaglate (hexabrix) in a randomized order. twenty minutes after applying a suprarenal clamp just above the right renal artery, two se lective intrarenal contrast media administrations were performed at 30-minu te intervals in a randomized order (ischemic period). RESULTS. During the control period ioxaglate and iodixanol induced no chang e in mean arterial blood pressure and pulse rate. the maximum decrease in r enal blood how (rbf) observed with ioxaglate was 19 +/- 4%, the maximum dec rease in rbf observed with iodixanol was 51 +/- 16% versus control period ( P = 0.05 compared with ioxaglate). During the ischemic period, renal perfus ion pressure was 72 +/- 2 mm Hg and 73 +/- 2 mm Hg before iodixanol and iox aglate administration, respectively (P = NS). Iodixanol induced a 61 +/- 11 % decrease in RBF. These changes were significantly higher than those obser ved with ioxaglate during the control period and with the control ischemic period. Ioxaglate induced a maximum 11 +/- 6% decrease in RBF at 1 min (P < 0.05 versus iodixanol), These modifications were not significantly higher than those observed during the control period. CONCLUSIONS. In this study the authors found that the renal effect of iodix anol are markedly more pronounced than that of ioxaglate. in the setting of ischemia the effects of iodixanol were only slightly enhanced whereas thos e of ioxaglate were not modified.