Ww. Fisher et al., Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training, J APPL BE A, 31(4), 1998, pp. 543-560
Functional communication training (FCT) is a popular treatment for problem
behaviors, but its effectiveness may be compromised when the client emits t
he target communication response and reinforcement is either delayed or den
ied. In the current investigation, we trained 2 individuals to emit differe
nt communication responses to request (a) the reinforcer for destructive be
havior in a given situation (e.g., contingent attention in the attention co
ndition of a functional analysis) and (b) an alternative reinforcer (e.g.,
toys in the attention condition of a functional analysis). Next, we taught
the participants to request each reinforcer in the presence of a different
discriminative stimulus (SD). Then, we evaluated the effects of differentia
l reinforcement of communication (DRC) using the functional and alternative
reinforcers and correlated S(D)s, with and without extinction of destructi
ve behavior. During all applications, DRC (in combination with S(D)s that s
ignaled available reinforcers) rapidly reduced destructive behavior to low
levels regardless of whether the functional reinforcer or an alternative re
inforcer was available or whether reinforcement for destructive behavior wa
s discontinued (i.e., extinction).