Ca. Haas et al., Use of ureteral stents in the management of major renal trauma with urinary extravasation: Is there a role?, J ENDOUROL, 12(6), 1998, pp. 545-549
Five patients with major (Grade IV) renal trauma required ureteral stent pl
acement to facilitate urinary drainage. Three of these patients had stents
placed for recurrent gross hematuria with flank pain. All three had obstruc
ting blood clots present at the time of stent placement. The fourth patient
had a stent placed because of persistent extravasation at 2 weeks postinju
ry, The last patient was considered at risk for persistent urinary extravas
ation because of a partial ureteropelvic junction obstruction and had a ure
teral stent placed as part of the initial management. All patients were fol
lowed radiographically for resolution of extravasation, Long-term clinical
follow-up consisted of serum creatinine evaluation and blood pressure monit
oring. Urinary extravasation resolved in all five patients, as determined b
y radiologic evaluation, at a mean of 8 days after stent placement. Uretera
l stents were left indwelling an average of 4 weeks. No patient developed h
ypertension, and all serum creatinine values were normal at a mean 26 month
s' follow-up, No patient developed urinoma or abscess, and none required op
en surgical exploration. Ureteral stents may be used safely and effectively
to treat persistent or recurrent urinary extravasation resulting from majo
r blunt renal trauma in appropriately selected patients. In addition, urete
ral stents may avoid the need for surgical exploration in patients with Gra
de IV renal trauma who develop recurrent gross hematuria, Bank pain, and pe
rsistent or recurrent extravasation secondary to clot obstruction.