M. Amanzio et F. Benedetti, Neuropharmacological dissection of placebo analgesia: Expectation-activated opioid systems versus conditioning-activated specific subsystems, J NEUROSC, 19(1), 1999, pp. 484-494
We investigated the mechanisms underlying the activation of endogenous opio
ids in placebo analgesia by using the model of human experimental ischemic
arm pain. Different types of placebo analgesic responses were evoked by mea
ns of cognitive expectation cues, drug conditioning, or a combination of bo
th. Drug conditioning was performed by means of either the opioid agonist m
orphine hydrochloride or the nonopioid ketorolac tromethamine. Expectation
cues produced placebo responses that were completely blocked by the opioid
antagonist naloxone. Expectation cues together with morphine conditioning p
roduced placebo responses that were completely antagonized by naloxone. Mor
phine conditioning alone (without expectation cues) induced a naloxone-reve
rsible placebo effect. By contrast, ketorolac conditioning together with ex
pectation cues elicited a placebo effect that was blocked by naloxone only
partially. Ketorolac conditioning alone produced placebo responses that wer
e naloxone-insensitive. Therefore, we evoked different types of placebo res
ponses that were either naloxone-reversible or partially naloxone-reversibl
e or, otherwise, naloxone-insensitive, depending on the procedure used to e
voke the placebo response. These findings show that cognitive factors and c
onditioning are balanced in different ways in placebo analgesia, and this b
alance is crucial for the activation of opioid or nonopioid systems. Expect
ation triggers endogenous opioids, whereas conditioning activates specific
subsystems. In fact, if conditioning is performed with opioids, placebo ana
lgesia is mediated via opioid receptors, if conditioning is performed with
nonopioid drugs, other nonopioid mechanisms result to be involved.