How costly is "Clean"? An analysis of the benefits and costs of superfund site remediations

Citation
Jt. Hamilton et Wk. Viscusi, How costly is "Clean"? An analysis of the benefits and costs of superfund site remediations, J POLICY AN, 18(1), 1999, pp. 2-27
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
02768739 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2 - 27
Database
ISI
SICI code
0276-8739(199924)18:1<2:HCI"AA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The cleanup of hazardous waste sites under the U.S. Environmental Protectio n Agency's Superfund program is governed by a number of legislative and reg ulatory constraints. Congress passed legislation in 1986 directing the Envi ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) to pursue permanent remedies that embodie d stringent cleanup standards. The agency has chosen to use conservative as sumptions in risk assessments at hazardous waste sites, including a presump tion that on-site risks for hypothetical future residents should be calcula ted in the site remediation process. This at-ride offers the first comprehe nsive assessment of the cost-effectiveness of these Superfund cleanups. Our results reveal that many EPA Superfund remediations fa ii a partial benefi t-cost test. For a sample of the 150 Superfund sites, we find that at the m ajority of sites the expected number of cancers averted by remediation is l ess than 0.1 cases per site and that the cost per cancer case averted is ov er $100 million. The analysis demonstrates the importance of explicitly cal culating the trade-offs embodied in environmental cleanup decisions. (C) 19 98 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.