Potential limitations in assessment practices with children who have severe
mental retardation have been identified in the literature. The purpose of
the study was to investigate the extent to which practicing school psycholo
gists use alternative methods as opposed to standardized/norm-referenced me
asures in the assessment of children suspected or identified as having mode
rate to severe/profound mental retardation. As part of a larger survey, ass
essment practices of school psychologists with children functioning in the
more severe level of mental retardation were reported by 202 school psychol
ogists. Results suggest that school psychologists use norm-referenced measu
res at all grade/age levels. Various other types of methods were also noted
by 0.5 to 35.8% of the respondents, with the highest frequency of alternat
ive approaches employed at the preschool level. Implications For assessment
practices with children with moderate to severe/profound mental retardatio
n and for the training of school psychologists in alternative methods of ev
aluation consistent with the need to link assessment to intervention are di
scussed.