Southern African historiography has become increasingly gender-sensitive in
the last decade. Primarily as a result of the impact of feminism in the wo
rld of work and in universities, research an women has burgeoned. The inclu
sion of women in the study of the past and the recognition of their agency
has filled an important lacuna but also has made evident the corresponding
gap in knowledge about men. The dominance of men in the public record has o
bscured the fact that little is known about masculinity. Men have generally
been treated in essentialist terms. The socially constructed nature of mas
culinity is widely acknowledged and it is this insight that needs to be app
lied to a study of the region's history. This article introduces readers to
the inter-disciplinary work on masculinity, reviews how research on gender
in South Africa has handled issues of men and masculinity and then suggest
s how insights taken from Men's Studies might help to broaden gender analys
is and enrich the study of the South African past. In this article, a range
of masculinities is identified. Colonialism created new and transformed ex
isting masculinities. Race and class featured prominently in the configurat
ion of these masculinities. Under colonialism positions of domination and s
ubordination were created along the fines of race, bequeathing to the regio
n the language of white men and black 'boys'. The particular trajectory of
colonialism ended the political independence of the indigenous polities and
destroyed their economic independence but the success of the defeated poli
ties in retaining possession of land and of the policies of segregation and
apartheid meant that key African institutions survived. These were the bas
is for an African masculinity that in certain geographical and social areas
disputed hegemony with white masculinities.