By ignoring the effects of nonlinear propagation, current exposimetry proto
cols may yield significant underestimates of the acoustic pressure in situ.
This problem can be avoided simply by (1) extrapolating pressures linearly
from low amplitude measurements in water and (2) linearly derating these v
alues to obtain estimates of fields insitu. The mechanical index was design
ed to pros ide an indication of temporal peak acoustic fields for use in pr
ediction of nonthermal biological effects in tissues. At low outputs, the m
echanical index, together with the frequency, gives the peak negative press
ure near the focus of the field. As currently formulated, however, the pres
sure used in the mechanical index may be far from the focus at high output
levels. Recommendations of the World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine a
nd Biology avoid the underestimate associated with nonlinear propagation as
well as other problems with the mechanical index and may be preferable in
dealing with nonthermal bioeffects. The thermal indices that are implemente
d currently in the Output Display Standard (American Institute of Ultrasoun
d in Medicine/National Electrical Manufacturers' Association) are affected
less seriously by nonlinear propagation.