LAPAROTOMY OR DRAIN FOR PERFORATED NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS - WHO GETS WHAT AND WHY

Citation
Ks. Azarow et al., LAPAROTOMY OR DRAIN FOR PERFORATED NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS - WHO GETS WHAT AND WHY, Pediatric surgery international, 12(2-3), 1997, pp. 137-139
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Pediatrics
ISSN journal
01790358
Volume
12
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
137 - 139
Database
ISI
SICI code
0179-0358(1997)12:2-3<137:LODFPN>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Between 1974 and 1988, 86 newborns with perforated necrotizing enteroc olitis (NEC) were treated by either laparotomy (usually involving a bo wel resection and a temporary stoma) or a peritoneal drain under local anesthesia. The survival of babies in the laparotomy group was 57% ve rsus 59% in the drained group. However, for neonates less than 1,000 g survival in the drained group was 69% compared to 22% for the laparot omy group (P <.01). as the weight of the babies increased over 1,000 g , the survival in the laparotomy group increased to 67%. There was no significant increase in survival in infants over 1,500 g. The highest neonatal mortality risk is generally found among babies weighing less than 1,000 g at birth with a gestational age of less than 30 weeks. Th is risk increases even more when perforated NEC is added to the premat urity. With the use of peritoneal drainage, survival in this group can approach that of larger neonates.