This article focuses on the role of councillors in planning. The views of t
he Nolan Committee, which were expressed in their third report are set into
the context of other reports, published during the 1990s, about the way co
uncillors exercised their planning responsibilities. Two contrasting views
of the planning system as a quasi-judicial process and as an administrative
/representative process are highlighted. The article concludes that the Nol
an report is significant because it reasserts the representative role of co
uncillors in contrast to the professional planning view that councillors sh
ould perform a quasi-judicial role.