Signaling via A(2A) adenosine receptor in four PC12 cell clones

Citation
G. Arslan et al., Signaling via A(2A) adenosine receptor in four PC12 cell clones, N-S ARCH PH, 359(1), 1999, pp. 28-32
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
00281298 → ACNP
Volume
359
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
28 - 32
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-1298(199901)359:1<28:SVAARI>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
PC12 cells are genetically labile and so-called wild-type cells comprise mu ltiple subclones. We have examined the A(2A) adenosine receptor signal tran sduction pathways in four such clones (denoted clones 1, 19, 21 and 27) of PC12 cells. Adenosine A(2A), A(2B) and A(1) receptor mRNAs were detected in all four clones by RT-PCR, whereas no A(3) receptor mRNA was found. A(2A) receptors were quantitated by radioligand binding using the antagonist radi oligand [H-3]SCH 58261 ([H-3]-5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazol o[4,3-e]-1,2,4 triazolo[1,5-c] pyrimidine). The B-max was highest in clone 1 followed by clones 21, 19 and 27. Whereas the amount of G(i) protein appe ared similar in all four clones, the amount of G(s) protein was higher in c lones 21 and 27 than in the other two clones. Maximal responses to the non- selective adenosine analogue NECA (5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine) were sim ilar to those observed with the selective adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 (2-[p-(2-carbonylethyl)phenylethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoade nosine), and were approximately equal in clones 1 and 21, but lower in clon e 19 and very low in clone 27. For both compounds EC50 was significantly hi gher in clone 27 than in clone 1. In both clones the response to NECA could be competitively antagonized by a selective adenosine A(2A) antagonist, SC H 58261. The present results show that different clones of PC12 cells differ widely in the cAMP increase induced by adenosine analogues and that this is due to differences in the amount of adenosine A(2A) receptor, G protein and effec tor. A large difference in receptor number resulted in differences in poten cy of an agonist.