Intraoperative clinical practice and risk of early complications after cataract extraction in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain

Citation
Jc. Norregaard et al., Intraoperative clinical practice and risk of early complications after cataract extraction in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain, OPHTHALMOL, 106(1), 1999, pp. 42-48
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology,"da verificare
Journal title
OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
01616420 → ACNP
Volume
106
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
42 - 48
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(199901)106:1<42:ICPARO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Objective: To examine variation in intraoperative clinical practice and rat es of adverse events after cataract surgery across four different healthcar e systems. Design: Multicenter cohort study. Participants: Patients were recruited from ophthalmic clinics in the United States (n = 75); in the Province of Manitoba, Canada (n = 12), in Denmark (n = 17); and the City of Barcelona, Spain (n = 10). In all, 1420 patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery were enrolled, with preoperative, per ioperative, and postoperative clinical data collected on 1344 patients (95% ). Main Outcome Measures: Occurrence of 23 specified intraoperative and early postoperative adverse events was measured. Four-month postoperative visual acuity outcome also was measured. Results: Phacoemulsification was performed in two thirds of the extractions in the United States and Manitoba, in one third in Denmark, and in 3% in B arcelona (P < 0.001), More than 96% of extractions in North America and Den mark were performed with the patient under local anesthesia, whereas genera l anesthesia was used for 38% of extractions in Barcelona (P < 0.001). Rate s of intraoperative adverse events were 11% to 12.8% in Manitoba, Denmark, and Barcelona and significantly lower in the United States (6%), mainly bec ause of a lower rate of capsular rupture (P < 0.01). Significantly higher r ates of early postoperative events were seen in the United States (18.8%) a nd Manitoba (20.4%) compared to Denmark (7.9%) and Barcelona (5%) (P < 0.00 1). The differences among sites in rates of events could not be explained b y differences in recorded patient characteristics or surgical techniques. T he occurrence of perioperative events was significantly associated with a w orse 4-month visual outcome. Conclusion: The observed variation in clinical practice might represent a g eneral trend of a slower diffusion of new medical technology in Europe comp ared with that of North America. Rates of intraoperative and early postoper ative events varied significantly across sites.