Jc. Norregaard et al., Intraoperative clinical practice and risk of early complications after cataract extraction in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain, OPHTHALMOL, 106(1), 1999, pp. 42-48
Objective: To examine variation in intraoperative clinical practice and rat
es of adverse events after cataract surgery across four different healthcar
e systems.
Design: Multicenter cohort study.
Participants: Patients were recruited from ophthalmic clinics in the United
States (n = 75); in the Province of Manitoba, Canada (n = 12), in Denmark
(n = 17); and the City of Barcelona, Spain (n = 10). In all, 1420 patients
undergoing first eye cataract surgery were enrolled, with preoperative, per
ioperative, and postoperative clinical data collected on 1344 patients (95%
).
Main Outcome Measures: Occurrence of 23 specified intraoperative and early
postoperative adverse events was measured. Four-month postoperative visual
acuity outcome also was measured.
Results: Phacoemulsification was performed in two thirds of the extractions
in the United States and Manitoba, in one third in Denmark, and in 3% in B
arcelona (P < 0.001), More than 96% of extractions in North America and Den
mark were performed with the patient under local anesthesia, whereas genera
l anesthesia was used for 38% of extractions in Barcelona (P < 0.001). Rate
s of intraoperative adverse events were 11% to 12.8% in Manitoba, Denmark,
and Barcelona and significantly lower in the United States (6%), mainly bec
ause of a lower rate of capsular rupture (P < 0.01). Significantly higher r
ates of early postoperative events were seen in the United States (18.8%) a
nd Manitoba (20.4%) compared to Denmark (7.9%) and Barcelona (5%) (P < 0.00
1). The differences among sites in rates of events could not be explained b
y differences in recorded patient characteristics or surgical techniques. T
he occurrence of perioperative events was significantly associated with a w
orse 4-month visual outcome.
Conclusion: The observed variation in clinical practice might represent a g
eneral trend of a slower diffusion of new medical technology in Europe comp
ared with that of North America. Rates of intraoperative and early postoper
ative events varied significantly across sites.