A geochemical study was undertaken to compare the geochemical parameters ob
tained from the analysis of different sample types of oils collected from t
he same horizons, in particular produced oil samples and oil extracted dire
ctly from reservoir cores in the laboratory and analysed by slightly differ
ent methods. It is not easy to carry out a major comparison because of the
scarcity of horizons from which both DST oil samples and cored reservoir sa
mples are available. BP was only able to locate such samples from three wel
ls (Kirklington-2, onshore England; Qusahwira-1, Middle East and 26/28-1, o
ffshore Ireland). The composition and concentration (petroleum/rock percent
age) of the oil in these three wells varied widely. Some molecular maturity
parameters, e.g. methylphenanthrenes and sterane isomerisation ratios, sug
gest that the extraction process mobilises lower maturity material from the
cores. In some cases the parameters contradict one another, possibly indic
ating measurement of different components of the petroleum or inherent unce
rtainties in the analysis. Source-type indicators are observed for some of
the oils and their respective core extract samples, from the same intervals
in the same wells, which suggest derivation from different types of organi
c material. The results show that it is not possible to characterise an oil
definitively by examination of the core extract, that the differences may
not be systematic and that comparison of oil and extract data from differen
t wells or horizons may be misreading. This study demonstrates some of the
differences that need to be taken into account during interpretation. (C) 1
998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.