The present paper is concerned with the effect of different characteristics
of behavioural prescriptions in order to study what we call 'minimal rule
behaviour'. With this term we refer to prescriptions for which there is no
visible rationale or social convention. Two field studies were conducted in
the subway of Rotterdam to investigate the effect of three dimensions of r
ules: (1) the relevance of the prescription, (2) the origin of the prescrip
tion, and (3) the level of imperativeness. A total of 1241 observations wer
e made and 611 short interviews were held. The results show that the mere p
resence of a written behavioural prescription has a very strong effect on a
ctual behaviour. In a third study the semantic aspects of behavioural presc
riptions were studied. For this study a questionnaire was administered to 4
01 undergraduate students. The results indicated a severity factor (related
to imperativeness) and a meaningfulness factor (related to the presence of
an explanation). Furthermore, increasing the imperativeness of a rule had
two countervailing effects: it both increased the rule's severity and its m
eaninglessness. Finally, in study 3 we found a clear effect of imperativene
ss on behavioural intentions, an effect that could not be ascertained in st
udies 1 and 2.