Increasing crop N use efficiency and minimizing environmental risk require
an accurate assessment of N taken up by the crop from different sources. We
conducted this study to: (i) compare the grain yields of corn (Zea mays L.
) in monoculture and in rotation with soybean [Glycine max (L,) Merr,]; (ii
) determine the contributions of N from fertilizer, soil, and legume residu
e to corn in the rotation; and (iii) compare N fertilizer recovery in monoc
ulture and in rotation. Two existing (>10 yr) irrigated corn-soybean rotati
on areas in Kansas were used. The soils were Crete silt loam (fine, smectit
ic, mesic: Pachic Argiustolls) and Eudora loam (coarse-silty, mixed, supera
ctive, mesic Fluventic Hapludolls). To trace the N through the rotation, N-
15 microplots (2.4 m(2)) were established in the corn. Microplots also Here
established in soybean to separately follow N-15 from roots + soil and sho
ots to corn. Crop rotation and fertilizer addition increased corn yield at
both sites for two growing seasons. Averaged for 2 yr, the amount of N need
ed in the continuous corn to achieve yield equal to that in rotation with n
o N added was equivalent to 144 kg N ha(-1) in the Crete silt loam and 155
kg N ha(-1) in the Eudora loam, Response to N was greater on the Eudora loa
m, probably because of textural and organic matter differences. In the Eudo
ra soil, significantly higher amounts of soil N Here taken up at harvest by
corn in rotation, whereas, in the Crete soil, corn in monoculture took up
significantly higher amounts of soil N, Corn plants recovered 3 kg N ha(-1)
(3%) from soybean residue in the Eudora soil and 5 kg N ha(-1) (14%) in th
e Crete soil. The main value of legume residue appears to be longterm maint
enance of soil N to ensure adequate delivery to future crops.