Laparoscopy in 533 patients with abdominal malignancy

Citation
Db. Pearlstone et al., Laparoscopy in 533 patients with abdominal malignancy, SURGERY, 125(1), 1999, pp. 67-72
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
SURGERY
ISSN journal
00396060 → ACNP
Volume
125
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
67 - 72
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-6060(199901)125:1<67:LI5PWA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Background. Laparoscopy in patients with intra-abdominal malignancy remains controversial. This study evaluates the incidence of tumor recurrence at t he Port site after laparoscopy in patients with intraabdominal malignancy. Methods. The medical records of all patients with nongynecologic malignanci es who underwent laparoscopic procedures between May 1, 1990, and June 30 1 996, at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed. Data on extent of tumor, histologic findings, primary location, procedures performed and complications were recorded. Results. During this time, 533 patients with known intra-abdominal malignan cies underwent laparoscopy. Mean follow-up time was 13.2 +/- 0.5 months (ra nge 1 to 71 months; median 10.6 months). Four recurrences at the port site were identified (0.8%). Three of these patients had advanced intra-abdomina l disease at the time of laparoscopy; I patient without advanced disease at the time of laparoscopy had a recurrence at the Port site as the only site of recurrent disease (0.19%). The incidence of port site recurrences among patients with advanced intra-abdominal disease at the time of laparoscopy (3/71) was significantly greater than the risk of development of a recurren ce at the Port site among patients without advanced intra-abdominal disease at the time of laparoscopy (1/462; P < .0003, by chi-square analysis). Conclusion. Recurrence at the port site is very rare. When implantation at the port site does occur; it is most commonly associated with advanced intr a-abdominal disease.