Vs. Tayal et al., Rapid-sequence intubation at an emergency medicine residency: Success rateand adverse events during a two-year period, ACAD EM MED, 6(1), 1999, pp. 31-37
Objectives: Rapid-sequence intubation (RSI) is an active airway interventio
n used frequently in emergency medicine (EM). The authors hypothesized that
RSI can be performed safely in the setting of an EM training program at a
tertiary care center. Methods: Observational study of RSI at an urban ED/Le
vel 1 trauma center with annual census of 100,000 patients. Consecutive pat
ients who underwent RSI during a two-year period were studied. Data include
d age, gender, type of patient (medical/trauma), indication for intubation,
number of intubation attempts (laryngoscope passes), training level of ope
rator, and major immediate adverse events (clinical deterioration within 10
minutes of RSI). Results: RSI was used in 417 of 596 (70%) critically ill
patients requiring emergent intubation. The patient demographic distributio
n was the following: adults 89.7%, male 58%, and trauma 44%. Primary indica
tions for intubation among RSI patients were as follows: mechanical ventila
tion 57.4%, airway protection 41.3%, and cardiac arrest 1.3%. Distribution
of intubations by level of EM training was PGY1, 5%; PGY2, 52%; PGY3, 40%;
and attendings, 3%. Intubations were successfully completed within two atte
mpts in 97% of the patients. Major immediate adverse events were encountere
d in six patients (1.4%) (hypotention = 2, hypoxemia = 1, dysrhythmia = 3).
There was no death attributable to RSI. The rate of intubations requiring
two or fewer attempts and without major immediate adverse events was 96%. T
hree patients required cricothyrotomy. Conclusion: In the setting of an EM
residency at a tertiary care ED, RSI can be performed successfully with few
major immediate adverse events.