Research fundamentals: IV. Choosing a research design

Citation
Kn. Hall et Ru. Kothari, Research fundamentals: IV. Choosing a research design, ACAD EM MED, 6(1), 1999, pp. 67-74
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10696563 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
67 - 74
Database
ISI
SICI code
1069-6563(199901)6:1<67:RFICAR>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Once a research question or hypothesis has been derived, the investigator m ust determine which research methodology can best answer his or her questio n. Prospective, randomized, controlled trials are often considered the sine qua non of research design. However, this study design is not always feasi ble, and often an alternate design will adequately answer the question at s ignificantly less cost. All research designs have potential advantages and limitations. The decision of which study design to use is often a compromis e between science and resources. This article was prepared by members of th e SAEM Research Committee to describe the fundamental research concepts of research design. This paper defines different research methodologies and di scusses their different uses, strengths, and weaknesses. It also describes the process of randomization and blinding. Finally, the concept of bias and its remedies is delineated.