Bw. Nelson et al., Can spinal surgery be prevented by aggressive strengthening exercises? A prospective study of cervical and lumbar patients, ARCH PHYS M, 80(1), 1999, pp. 20-25
Objective: To determine if patients recommended for spinal surgery can avoi
d the surgery through an aggressive strengthening program.
Setting: A privately owned clinic, staffed by physicians and physical thera
pists, that provides treatment for patients with neck and/or back pain.
Methods: Over a period of 2 1/2 years, consecutive patients referred to the
clinic for evaluation and treatment were enrolled in the study if they (1)
had a physician's recommendation for lumbar or cervical surgery, (2) had n
o medical condition preventing exercise, and (3) were willing to participat
e in the approximately 10-week outpatient program. Treatment consisted main
ly of intensive, progressive resistance exercise of the isolated lumbar or
cervical spine. Exercise was continued to failure, and patients were encour
aged to work through their pain. Third-party payers in Minneapolis were sur
veyed for average costs. Average follow-up occurred 16 months after dischar
ge.
Results: Forty-six of the 60 participants completed the program; 38 were av
ailable for follow-up and three required surgery after completing the progr
am.
Discussion/Conclusions : Despite methodologic limitations, the results are
intriguing. A large number of patients who had been told they needed surger
y were able to avoid surgery in the short term by aggressive strengthening
exercise. This study suggests the need to define precisely what constitutes
"adequate conservative care." (C) 1999 by the American Congress of Rehabil
itation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabili
tation.