Prognostic factors in T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

Citation
M. Tachibana et al., Prognostic factors in T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus, ARCH SURG, 134(1), 1999, pp. 50-54
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00040010 → ACNP
Volume
134
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
50 - 54
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-0010(199901)134:1<50:PFITAT>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Background: Prognostic indicators in patients with T2 tumor have not been f ully understood. Objective: To clarify the clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term r esults of T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus. Design: Consecutive case series. Setting: Department of surgery in a university hospital. Patients: Of 234 patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the thora cic esophagus, 142 patients underwent esophagectomy with curative intent: 9 7 patients had pT1 and pT2 tumors. Interventions: Investigated were clinicopathologic characteristics of 65 of 97 patients with pT1 and pT2 tumors; excluded were 7 patients who died of postoperative complications and another 25 patients who died of causes othe r than esophageal cancer. Main Outcome Measures: Clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term resu lts. Results: Pathologic tumor stages were pT1 N0 in 23 patients, pT1 N(+) in 7 patients, pT2 N0 in 15 patients, and pT2 N(+) in 20 patients. Fifty patient s are alive and free of cancer and 15 patients died of tumor recurrence (1 patient with pT1 N0 tumor, 1 patient with pT1 N[+] [+] tumor, 1 patient wit h pT2 N0 tumor, and 12 patients with pT2 N[+] tumor). The sites of metastat ic nodes in 6 survivors with pT1 N(+) tumor were a solitary perigastric nod e in 4 patients, a solitary mediastinal node in 1 patient, and 2 mediastina l nodes in 1 patient. The 5-year survival rates of patients with pT1 N0, pT 1 N(+), and pT2 N0 tumors all exceeded 85%, and the rate of those with pT2 N(+) tumor was 33.9% (pT2 N[+] vs others: pT1. N0, pT1 N[+], and pT2 N0; P= .003). The factors affecting survival rate by univariate analysis were Borr mann classification (0, 1 vs 2, 3, 4), tumor size (<4.0 vs greater than or equal to 4.0 cm), combined T, N factor (pT2 N[+] vs others), time of operat ion (less than or equal to 420 vs >420 minutes), estimated blood loss (<100 0 vs greater than or equal to 1000 mt), and lymph vessel invasion (marked v s not marked). Stage pT2 N(+) tumor became a single independent prognostic factor for survival as determined by multivariate analysis (pT2 N[+] vs oth ers; P=.008). Conclusions: Stage pT1 N(+) turners with a few diseased nodes and pT2 N0 tu mors are considered to be a group with an excellent prognosis, similar to p T1 N0 tumors. Patients with pT2 N(+) diseases had worse prognoses and thus should have meticulous lymph node dissection and extensive adjuvant therapy .