PURPOSE: The authors provide a review: of the economic evaluation literatur
e of breast cancer screening and identify important trends and gaps in the
literature.
OVERVIEW: Healthcare resources ate limited and economic evaluation plays a
critical role in resource allocation, healthcare policy, and clinical decis
ions. Many economic evaluations of medical practice, however, are unreliabl
e and do not use appropriate analytic techniques. Three important trends we
re observed. First, two economic evaluation methods are dominant. Second, a
wide range of cost estimates exists across studies. Third, a lack of stand
ardization exists across studies with regard to basic economic evaluation p
rinciples. These findings should be considered when conducting future resea
rch, analyzing economic evaluations of breast cancer screening, and develop
ing clinical guidelines.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Concerns about cost containment in healthcare make i
t necessary for physicians and clinical administrators to take an active ro
le in resource allocation decisions at the clinical la el. For instance, th
e recent debate on the proper age to begin annual mammography screening inv
olves both resource allocation and clinical issues. Thus, it is important f
or physicians and clinical administrators to be familiar with the economic
evaluation literature of breast cancer screening, economic evaluation metho
dology and the associated shortcomings of published estimates.