Background: Medical screening is used routinely to qualify and classif
y candidates for pilot training. The respiratory system assumes even g
reater importance owing to the increased stress of flying high-perform
ance aircraft in a hostile environment characterized by high altitude,
varying acceleration (''G'' forces), and the possibility of rapid dec
ompression. Any respiratory dysfunction may threaten the pilot's healt
h, night safety, and completion of the mission. Only those candidates
with the highest psychophysical score are accepted to undergo special
aeromedical screening, physical suitability is an important factor in
the selection and classification of candidates for flight training pro
grams, and pulmonary function testing is central within this screening
protocol.Methods: We developed a respiratory algorithm for this uniqu
e screening process. The algorithm represents a practical and efficien
t approach for large-scale screening of healthy candidates for flight
training. The algorithm deals with the major pulmonary health problems
encountered in a previously screened healthy population aged 17 to 25
years. If by anamnesis, physical examination results, or baseline spi
rometry findings there is reason to suspect a respiratory problem that
could emerge to endanger the pilot's life, a specially designed evalu
ation is performed according to the algorithm. We explain, step by ste
p, the basis for each suggested test in order to reach a decision (ope
rational specifications). The pulmonary function studies we recommend
are reasonably priced and can be easily and reliably performed by regu
lar medical staff technicians. The major justification for performing
pulmonary function studies in a healthy population that has already go
ne through a preliminary medical screening and has been found fit is t
o identify occult or latent abnormalities. These abnormalities may hav
e no or minimal clinical expression under ordinary circumstances but,
under the stress of night during the ensuing 5 to 10 years, may produc
e serious limitation in function. Results: Two cases, seen in the Air
Force Medical Center, are presented to illustrate how the algorithm is
implemented. The algorithm has been in use for more than 5 years, and
has been applied to the screening of several thousand candidates. Fol
low-up of the accepted candidates has not revealed any significant def
ects in the decision-making process. Conclusion: Use of the algorithm
is highly cost-effective since it allows for nonspecialist physicians
to carry out pulmonary screening and involves the pulmonary specialist
only infrequently, ie, when a particularly complicated and/or borderl
ine case is encountered. It is our contention that a similar algorithm
would be useful in many other settings where large-scale screening is
required.