Action and intermodal information influence the perception of orientation

This study concerned the perception of bodily orientation. We varied the or ientation of the body relative to the visible surroundings and, independent ly, relative to the direction of balance. This created 3 tilt conditions th at are commonly believed to create conflict between the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems. First, we replicated earlier effects, confirmin g the existence of the visual frame effect and the Muller effect, when part icipants made passive judgments about orientation. In later experiments usi ng the same tilt conditions, participants executed a pointing task. In the pointing task errors were greatly reduced and in some cases were entirely a bsent. Based on these data (and similar findings in other studies), we argu e that illusions of body orientation are highly task-specific and may not b e general properties of the perception of orientation. The use of tilt rela tive to different referents made it possible for us to contrast the sensory conflict interpretation of orientation perception (which predicts frequent errors arising from indirect perception) with an alternative based on the pickup of intermodal relations extending across perceptual systems (which p redicts generally accurate performance arising from direct perception). By conducting comparisons across pairs of tilt conditions, we were able to hol d constant the stimulation to individual perceptual systems while varying t he higher order relation across systems. The results of these pairwise comp arisons were compatible with the hypothesis that in perceiving orientation people rely on information in these higher order patterns.