One of the most common assertions has been that Amartya Sen has been given
the Nobel Prize for his humanitarianism or for showing how famines can occu
r during times of plenty or how famines are unlikely in a democracy or for
his work in development economics. The exception is the official Nobel cita
tion released by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which states that S
en has been given the Prize "for his contributions to welfare economics". T
his is the work reported in his classic book Collective Choice and Social W
elfare, a work of immense elegance that combines formal logic, welfare econ
omics and moral philosophy.
A large part of Sen's recent work is that of a person with a cause and this
Sen II must be evaluated differently from Sen I. While the former may not
add to the scientific worth of Sen I, it does not detract from that either.