An in vitro approach was used to measure the genotoxicity of creosote-conta
minated soil before and after four bioremediation processes. The soil was t
aken from the Reilly Tar site, a closed Superfund site in Saint Louis Park,
Minnesota. The creosote soil was bioremediated in bioslurry, biopile, comp
ost. and land treatment, which were optimized for effective treatment Mutag
enicity profiles of dichloromethane extracts of the five soils were determi
ned in the Spiral technique of the Salmonella assay with seven tester strai
ns. Quantitative mutagenic responses in the plate incorporation technique w
ere then determined in the most sensitive strains, YG1041 and YG1042. Mutag
enic potency (revertants per microgram extract) in YG1041 suggested that co
mpost, land treatment, and untreated creosote soil extracts were moderately
mutagenic with Arochlor-induced rat liver (S9) but were nonmutagenic witho
ut S9. However. the bioslurry extract was strongly mutagenic and the biopil
e extract was moderately mutagenic either with or without S9. A similar tre
nd was obtained in strain YG1042. The strong mutagenic activity in the bios
lurry extract was reduced by 50% in TA98NR, which suggested the presence of
mutagenic nitrohydrocarbons. Variation in reproducibility was 15% or less
for the bioassay and extraction procedures. Bioavailability of mutagens in
the biopile soil was determined with six solvents, water-soluble mutagens a
ccounted for 40% of the total mutagenic activity and they were stable at ro
om temperature. The mutagenic activity in the bioslurry and biopile samples
was due to either the processes themselves or to the added sludge/manure a
mendments. The in vitro approach was effective in monitoring bioremediated
soils for genotoxicity and will be useful in future laboratory and in situ
studies.