The prognostic role of gender in survival of adult cancer patients

Citation
A. Micheli et al., The prognostic role of gender in survival of adult cancer patients, EUR J CANC, 34(14), 1998, pp. 2271-2278
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN journal
09598049 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
14
Year of publication
1998
Pages
2271 - 2278
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-8049(199812)34:14<2271:TPROGI>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Many observations indicate that women have a much longer expectancy of life than men. Some population-based studies on cancer patients support the ide a of the role of gender in predicting survival. However, the data are somew hat contrasting and inconclusive. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the prognostic role of gender for cancer patients, making use of the large set of survival data made available by the EUROCARE II project for the per iod 1985-1989. By applying a multivariate approach the major confounders su ch as age, geographical area and cancer site were considered in analysing s urvival data on more than 1 million cancer cases collected by 45 population -based cancer registries in 17 European countries. The results were consist ent with the general observation that in the industrialised countries women tend to survive longer than men. The multivariate analysis showed better s urvival from cancer in women than in men, estimated as an overall 2% lower relative risk of dying. The female advantage was particularly evident in yo ung cases, reduced in patients in middle age groups and in the oldest patie nts completely reversed so that at this age men had the better prognosis. L onger survival for women was not present immediately after diagnosis, but t he major advantage was seen after 3 years of follow-up. The risk of death f or women was significantly lower for cancer of the head and neck, oesophagu s, stomach, liver and pancreas. For bladder cancer, the risk of death was s ignificantly greater for women. These results can be explained by gender di fferences in sub-site distributions (head and neck and stomach) and by the differences in the stage at diagnosis (presumably bladder). However, the co nsistency of the data, evident only when a vast set of data is analysed, su ggest that women may be intrinsically more robust than men in coping with c ancer. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.