To investigate the hypothesis that commercial kits for CFU-GM (colony formi
ng unit granulocyte-macrophage) assay will reduce the interlaboratory varia
tion noted by many workers, we carried out a quality assurance exercise in
2 parts. There were 8 participants in the first study and each performed CF
U-GM assays using their in-house method and a commercial kit (Stem Cell CFU
Kit, Gibco) in parallel. In the second exercise there were 10 participants
and each performed CFU-GM with inhouse methods and with a different commer
cial medium (Methocult GF H4534, Stem Cell Technologies). Twelve samples of
cryopreserved peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were analysed by ea
ch participant in each part of the study. A very wide range of results was
found for the different in-house methods, but standardizing the clonogenic
assay with the commercial kits did not reduce the variation seen. To improv
e the reproducibility of CFU-GM assays between laboratories, scrupulous att
ention should be paid to all the steps involved in the assays, as little pr
ogress will be made by using commercial medium in isolation from efforts to
reduce other sources of variation.