J. Mehta et al., OUTCOME OF ACUTE-LEUKEMIA RELAPSING AFTER BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION- UTILITY OF 2ND TRANSPLANTS AND ADOPTIVE IMMUNOTHERAPY, Bone marrow transplantation, 19(7), 1997, pp. 709-719
We studied 231 acute leukemia patients relapsing after allogeneic (n =
114) or autologous (n = 117) BMT to assess the outcome of further the
rapy, In general, all patients in good condition were eligible for sec
ond transplants except for post-allograft relapses from 1993-1994 onwa
rds who received cytokine- or cell-mediated immunotherapy. The major r
eason for patients not progressing to second graft was death from prog
ressive disease or toxicity of salvage chemotherapy, Seventeen of 231
patients (7%) were alive at the last follow-up, Six of 14 post-autogra
ft relapses treated with second transplants were alive and well, compa
red with five of 103 not undergoing second grafts (P < 0.0001), One of
23 post-allograft recipients treated with second allografts was alive
with an extramedullary relapse, compared with five of 13 receiving im
munotherapy and none of 78 receiving standard-dose or palliative thera
py (P < 0.0001), We conclude that only a small proportion of highly se
lected acute leukemia patients relapsing after a transplant reach the
stage of a conventional second transplant, In our experience, second a
llografts after myeloablative therapy in patients relapsing after one
allograft are associated with very poor results, and immunotherapy may
be a better approach in such cases, Selected patients relapsing after
an autograft may become long-term survivors following a second autogr
aft or an allograft.