Kr. Zamudio, The evolution of female-biased sexual size dimorphism: A population-level comparative study in horned lizards (Phrynosoma), EVOLUTION, 52(6), 1998, pp. 1821-1833
Female-biased sexual size dimorphism is uncommon among vertebrates and trad
itionally has been attributed to asymmetric selective pressures favoring la
rge fecund females (the fecundity-advantage hypothesis) and/or small mobile
males (the small-male advantage hypothesis). I use a phylogenetically base
d comparative method to address these hypotheses for the evolution and main
tenance of sexual size dimorphism among populations of three closely relate
d lizard species (Phrynosoma douglasi, P. ditmarsi, and P. hernandezi). Wit
h independent contrasts I estimate evolutionary correlations among female b
ody size, male body size, and sexual size dimorphism (SSD) to determine whe
ther males have become small, females have become large, or both sexes have
diverged concurrently in body size during the evolutionary Xhistory of thi
s group. Population differences in degree of SSD are inversely correlated w
ith average male body size, but are not correlated with average female body
size. Thus, variation in SSD among populations has occurred predominantly
through changes in male size, suggesting that selective pressures on small
males may affect degree of SSD in this group. I explore three possible evol
utionary mechanisms by which the mean male body size in a population could
evolve: changes in size at maturity, changes in the variance of male body s
izes, and changes in skewness of male body size distributions. Comparative
analyses indicate that population differentiation in male body size is achi
eved by changes in male size at maturity, without changes in the variance o
r skewness of male and female size distributions. This study demonstrates t
he potential of comparative methods at lower taxonomic levels (among popula
tions and closely related species) for studying microevolutionary processes
that underlie population differentiation.